Welcome to Anagrammer Crossword Genius! Keep reading below to see if ongrowth is an answer to any crossword puzzle or word game (Scrabble, Words With Friends etc). Scroll down to see all the info we have compiled on ongrowth.
ongrowth
Searching in Crosswords ...
The answer ONGROWTH has 0 possible clue(s) in existing crosswords.
Searching in Word Games ...
The word ONGROWTH is NOT valid in any word game. (Sorry, you cannot play ONGROWTH in Scrabble, Words With Friends etc)
There are 8 letters in ONGROWTH ( G2H4N1O1R1T1W4 )
To search all scrabble anagrams of ONGROWTH, to go: ONGROWTH?
Rearrange the letters in ONGROWTH and see some winning combinations
Scrabble results that can be created with an extra letter added to ONGROWTH
5 letters out of ONGROWTH
4 letters out of ONGROWTH
3 letters out of ONGROWTH
Searching in Dictionaries ...
Definitions of ongrowth in various dictionaries:
No definitions found
Word Research / Anagrams and more ...
Keep reading for additional results and analysis below.
Ongrowth might refer to |
---|
On Growth and Form is a book by the Scottish mathematical biologist D'Arcy Wentworth Thompson (1860–1948). The book is long – 793 pages in the first edition of 1917, 1116 pages in the second edition of 1942. * The book covers many topics including the effects of scale on the shape of animals and plants, large ones necessarily being relatively thick in shape; the effects of surface tension in shaping soap films and similar structures such as cells; the logarithmic spiral as seen in mollusc shells and ruminant horns; the arrangement of leaves and other plant parts (phyllotaxis); and Thompson's own method of transformations, showing the changes in shape of animal skulls and other structures on a Cartesian grid. * The work is widely admired by biologists, anthropologists and architects among others, but less often read than cited. Peter Medawar explains this as being because it clearly pioneered the use of mathematics in biology, and helped to defeat mystical ideas of vitalism; but that the book is weakened by Thompson's failure to understand the role of evolution and evolutionary history in shaping living structures. Philip Ball and Michael Ruse, on the other hand, suspect that while Thompson argued for physical mechanisms, his rejection of natural selection bordered on vitalism. |