Crossword Solver > found answer > DENYINGL

×
×
How many letters in the Answer?

Welcome to Anagrammer Crossword Genius! Keep reading below to see if denyingl is an answer to any crossword puzzle or word game (Scrabble, Words With Friends etc). Scroll down to see all the info we have compiled on denyingl.

CROSSWORD
ANSWER

denyingl

Searching in Crosswords ...

The answer DENYINGL has 0 possible clue(s) in existing crosswords.

Searching in Word Games ...

The word DENYINGL is NOT valid in any word game. (Sorry, you cannot play DENYINGL in Scrabble, Words With Friends etc)

There are 8 letters in DENYINGL ( D2E1G2I1L1N1Y4 )

To search all scrabble anagrams of DENYINGL, to go: DENYINGL?

Rearrange the letters in DENYINGL and see some winning combinations

Dictionary
Game

note: word points are shown in red

Scrabble results that can be created with an extra letter added to DENYINGL

DENYINGLY

7 letters out of DENYINGL

DENYING LENDING

6 letters out of DENYINGL

DINGEY DINGLE DYEING DYNEIN EDGILY ENDING ENGILD GINNED LINDEN LINENY

5 letters out of DENYINGL

DEIGN DINGE DINGY DYING DYNEL EYING GELID GINNY GLIDE INGLE INNED LEDGY LINDY LINED LINEN LINEY LINGY LYING YIELD

4 letters out of DENYINGL

DEIL DELI DENI DENY DIEL DINE DING DYNE EDGY GELD GIED GIEN GILD GLED GLEN GLEY IDLE IDLY IDYL INLY LEND LIED LIEN LINE LING LINN LINY NIDE NINE YELD

3 letters out of DENYINGL

DEL DEN DEY DIE DIG DIN DYE ELD END ENG GED GEL GEN GEY GID GIE GIN INN LED LEG LEI LEY LID LIE LIN LYE NEG NIL YEN YID YIN

2 letters out of DENYINGL

DE ED EL EN ID IN LI NE YE

Searching in Dictionaries ...

Definitions of denyingl in various dictionaries:

No definitions found

Word Research / Anagrams and more ...


Keep reading for additional results and analysis below.

Denyingl might refer to
Denying the antecedent, sometimes also called inverse error or fallacy of the inverse, is a formal fallacy of inferring the inverse from the original statement. It is committed by reasoning in the form:
* If P, then Q.
* Therefore, if not P, then not Q.which may also be phrased as*
*
*
* P
* →
* Q
*
*
* {\displaystyle P\rightarrow Q}
* (P implies Q)
*
*
*
*
* ∴
* ¬
* P
* →
* ¬
* Q
*
*
* {\displaystyle \therefore \neg P\rightarrow \neg Q}
* (therefore, not-P implies not-Q)Arguments of this form are invalid. Informally, this means that arguments of this form do not give good reason to establish their conclusions, even if their premises are true.
* The name denying the antecedent derives from the premise "not P", which denies the "if" clause of the conditional premise.
* One way to demonstrate the invalidity of this argument form is with a counterexample that has true premises but an obviously false conclusion. For example:
*
* If you are a ski instructor, then you have a job.
* You are not a ski instructor
* Therefore, you have no jobThat argument is intentionally bad, but arguments of the same form can sometimes seem superficially convincing, as in the following example offered by Alan Turing in the article "Computing Machinery and Intelligence":
*
* If each man had a definite set of rules of conduct by which he regulated his life he would be no better than a machine. But there are no such rules, so men cannot be machines.
* However, men could still be machines that do not follow a definite set of rules. Thus, this argument (as Turing intends) is invalid.
* It is possible that an argument that denies the antecedent could be valid, if the argument instantiates some other valid form. For example, if the claims P and Q express the same proposition, then the argument would be trivially valid, as it would beg the question. In everyday discourse, however, such cases are rare, typically only occurring when the "if-then" premise is actually an "if and only if" claim (i.e., a biconditional/equality). For example:
*
* If I am President of the United States, then I can veto Congress.
* I am not President.
* Therefore, I cannot veto Congress.The above argument is not valid, but would be if the first premise ended thus: "...and if I can veto Congress, then I am the U.S. President" (as is in fact true). More to the point, the validity of the new argument stems not from denying the antecedent, but modus tollens (denying the consequent).
Anagrammer Crossword Solver is a powerful crossword puzzle resource site. We maintain millions of regularly updated crossword solutions, clues and answers of almost every popular crossword puzzle and word game out there. We encourage you to bookmark our puzzle solver as well as the other word solvers throughout our site. Explore deeper into our site and you will find many educational tools, flash cards and plenty more resources that will make you a much better player. Denyingl: Denying the antecedent, sometimes also called inverse error or fallacy of the inverse, is a formal f...