Welcome to Anagrammer Crossword Genius! Keep reading below to see if reductioadabsur is an answer to any crossword puzzle or word game (Scrabble, Words With Friends etc). Scroll down to see all the info we have compiled on reductioadabsur.
reductioadabsur
Searching in Crosswords ...
The answer REDUCTIOADABSUR has 1 possible clue(s) in existing crosswords.
Searching in Word Games ...
The word REDUCTIOADABSUR is NOT valid in any word game. (Sorry, you cannot play REDUCTIOADABSUR in Scrabble, Words With Friends etc)
Searching in Dictionaries ...
Definitions of reductioadabsur in various dictionaries:
No definitions found
Word Research / Anagrams and more ...
Keep reading for additional results and analysis below.
Possible Crossword Clues |
---|
Logical principle that applies to 17-, 27- and 48-Across, aptly |
Last Seen in these Crosswords & Puzzles |
---|
Jun 16 2011 L.A. Times Daily |
Reductioadabsur might refer to |
---|
In logic, reductio ad absurdum (Latin for "reduction to absurdity"), also known as argumentum ad absurdum (Latin for "argument to absurdity"), apagogical arguments or the appeal to extremes, is a form of argument that attempts either to disprove a statement by showing it inevitably leads to a ridiculous, absurd, or impractical conclusion, or to prove one by showing that if it were not true, the result would be absurd or impossible. Traced back to classical Greek philosophy in Aristotle's Prior Analytics (Greek: ἡ εἰς τὸ ἀδύνατον ἀπόδειξις, lit. 'demonstration to the impossible', 62b), this technique has been used throughout history in both formal mathematical and philosophical reasoning, as well as in debate. * The "absurd" conclusion of a reductio ad absurdum argument can take a range of forms, as these examples show:* The Earth cannot be flat; otherwise, we would find people falling off the edge. * There is no smallest positive rational number because, if there were, then it could be divided by two to get a smaller one.The first example argues that denial of the premise would result in a ridiculous conclusion, against the evidence of our senses. The second example is a mathematical proof by contradiction which argues that the denial of the premise would result in a logical contradiction (there is a "smallest" number and yet there is a number smaller than it). |