Welcome to Anagrammer Crossword Genius! Keep reading below to see if ninetieth is an answer to any crossword puzzle or word game (Scrabble, Words With Friends etc). Scroll down to see all the info we have compiled on ninetieth.
ninetieth
Searching in Crosswords ...
The answer NINETIETH has 10 possible clue(s) in existing crosswords.
Searching in Word Games ...
The word NINETIETH is VALID in some board games. Check NINETIETH in word games in Scrabble, Words With Friends, see scores, anagrams etc.
Searching in Dictionaries ...
Definitions of ninetieth in various dictionaries:
noun - position 90 in a countable series of things
adj - the ordinal number of ninety in counting order
The ordinal number matching the number 90 in a series.
more
Word Research / Anagrams and more ...
Keep reading for additional results and analysis below.
| Possible Dictionary Clues |
|---|
| A bninetiethb is one of ninety equal parts of something. (bDefinitionb of bninetiethb from the Cambridge Academic Content bDictionaryb Cambridge University Press) Translations of bninetiethb in Chinese (Simplified) |
| The ordinal number matching the number 90 in a series. |
| One of 90 equal parts. |
| position 90 in a countable series of things |
| the ordinal number of ninety in counting order |
| 90th written as a word |
| one of 90 equal parts of something |
| (in the position of) the number 90 in a series 90th: |
| A ninetieth is one of ninety equal parts of something. |
| Ninetieth might refer to |
|---|
| The Ninetieth Minnesota State Senate, et al., v. Mark B. Dayton, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Minnesota, et al., 62-CV-17-3601, was a Minnesota Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that governor Mark Dayton's line item vetoes of appropriations for the Minnesota Senate and Minnesota House of Representatives were a lawful exercise of his authority granted by Article IV, Section 23 of the Minnesota Constitution. The Court also ruled that since the state legislature had access to other funding in order to continue operating as a fully functioning and independent branch of government, the governor's vetoes did not effectively abolish the legislature and thereby violate Article III of the state constitution. Additionally, the Court ruled that the judicial branch did not have the constitutional authority to order funding without a corresponding budgetary appropriation. The Supreme Court's ruling overturned an earlier ruling by a Ramsey County court judge. The case marked the first time in which the Minnesota Supreme Court was asked to resolve a lawsuit brought by one branch of government against another. |