Welcome to Anagrammer Crossword Genius! Keep reading below to see if cretics is an answer to any crossword puzzle or word game (Scrabble, Words With Friends etc). Scroll down to see all the info we have compiled on cretics.
cretics
Searching in Crosswords ...
The answer CRETICS has 0 possible clue(s) in existing crosswords.
Searching in Word Games ...
The word CRETICS is VALID in some board games. Check CRETICS in word games in Scrabble, Words With Friends, see scores, anagrams etc.
Searching in Dictionaries ...
Definitions of cretics in various dictionaries:
noun - a type of metrical foot
Word Research / Anagrams and more ...
Keep reading for additional results and analysis below.
Possible Dictionary Clues |
---|
A metrical foot containing one short or unstressed syllable between two long or stressed ones. |
Cretics might refer to |
---|
Criticism of Wikipedia has been directed at its content, its procedures, the character and practices of the Wikipedia community, and its nature as an open-source encyclopedia that anyone can edit. The principal concerns of its critics are the factual reliability of the content; the readability of the prose; the organization of the articles; and the existence of systemic, gender, and racial biases among the editorial community. Wikipedia also has been criticized for uneven handling, acceptance, and retention of articles on controversial topics. Further concerns include the editorial vandalism allowed by anonymous editing, the possible formation of editing cliques, and over-complicated rules requiring frequent discussion and sometimes leading to wikilawyering. All of which sometimes gives rise to predictions of Wikipedia's end. * Wikipedia is also sometimes characterized as having a hostile editing environment. In his book Common Knowledge?: An Ethnography of Wikipedia (2014), Dariusz Jemielniak, a steward for Wikimedia Foundation projects, stated that the complexity of the rules and laws governing editorial content and editors' behavior is a licence for the "office politics" of disruptive editors and drives away new, potentially constructive editors. In a follow-up article, "The Unbearable Bureaucracy of Wikipedia" (2014), Jemielniak said that abridging and rewriting the editorial rules and laws of Wikipedia for clarity of purpose and simplicity of application would resolve the bureaucratic bottleneck of too many rules. In "The Rise and Decline of an Open Collaboration System: How Wikipedia's Reaction to Popularity is Causing its Decline" (2013), Aaron Halfaker stated that the over-complicated rules provoked the decline in editorial participation that began in 2009—frightening away new editors who otherwise would contribute to Wikipedia. |