Welcome to Anagrammer Crossword Genius! Keep reading below to see if betrayers is an answer to any crossword puzzle or word game (Scrabble, Words With Friends etc). Scroll down to see all the info we have compiled on betrayers.
betrayers
Searching in Crosswords ...
The answer BETRAYERS has 3 possible clue(s) in existing crosswords.
Searching in Word Games ...
The word BETRAYERS is VALID in some board games. Check BETRAYERS in word games in Scrabble, Words With Friends, see scores, anagrams etc.
Searching in Dictionaries ...
Definitions of betrayers in various dictionaries:
noun - one who reveals confidential information in return for money
noun - a person who says one thing and does another
verb - to aid an enemy of
Word Research / Anagrams and more ...
Keep reading for additional results and analysis below.
| Possible Crossword Clues |
|---|
| They renege, being disloyal |
| Line dividing improves disheartened shoppers |
| Bare tyres? Sorry - they've sold out! |
| Last Seen in these Crosswords & Puzzles |
|---|
| Jul 5 2018 Irish Times (Crosaire) |
| May 13 2016 The Telegraph - Toughie |
| Nov 17 2008 Irish Times (Simplex) |
| Possible Dictionary Clues |
|---|
| Plural form of betrayer. |
| to deliver or expose to an enemy by treachery or disloyalty: Benedict Arnold betrayed his country. to be unfaithful in guarding, maintaining, or fulfilling: to betray a trust. |
| Betrayers description |
|---|
|
Betrayers of the Truth: Fraud and Deceit in the Halls of Science is a book by William Broad and Nicholas Wade, published in 1982 by Simon & Schuster in New York, and subsequently (1983) also by Century Publishing in London, and with a simplified subtitle as Betrayers of the Truth: Fraud and Deceit in Science by Oxford University Press in 1985. The book is a critique of some widely held beliefs about the nature of science and the scientific process. * The book argues that the conventional wisdom that science is a strictly logical process, with objectivity the essence of scientist's attitudes, errors being speedily corrected by rigorous peer scrutiny and experiment replication, is a mythical ideal.* Our conclusion, in brief, is that science bears little resemblance to its conventional portrait. We believe that the logical structure discernible in scientific knowledge says nothing about the process by which the structure was built or the mentality of the builders. In the acquisition of knowledge, scientists are not guided by logic and objectivity alone, but also by such nonrational factors as rhetoric, propaganda, and personal prejudice. Scientists do not depend solely on rational thought, and have no monopoly on it. * * The authors present a series of case studies associated with the conduct of scientific research, from the manipulation of results to the total fabrication of whole experiments. |