Welcome to Anagrammer Crossword Genius! Keep reading below to see if overmatch is an answer to any crossword puzzle or word game (Scrabble, Words With Friends etc). Scroll down to see all the info we have compiled on overmatch.
overmatch
Searching in Crosswords ...
The answer OVERMATCH has 6 possible clue(s) in existing crosswords.
Searching in Word Games ...
The word OVERMATCH is VALID in some board games. Check OVERMATCH in word games in Scrabble, Words With Friends, see scores, anagrams etc.
Searching in Dictionaries ...
Definitions of overmatch in various dictionaries:
To be more than a match for; exceed or defeat.
To match with a superior opponent.
Word Research / Anagrams and more ...
Keep reading for additional results and analysis below.
| Possible Dictionary Clues |
|---|
| be stronger, better armed, or more skilful than. |
| Be stronger, better armed, or more skilful than. |
| To be more than a match for exceed or defeat. |
| To match with a superior opponent. |
| A contest in which one opponent is distinctly superior. |
| Overmatch might refer to |
|---|
| Matching is a statistical technique which is used to evaluate the effect of a treatment by comparing the treated and the non-treated units in an observational study or quasi-experiment (i.e. when the treatment is not randomly assigned). The goal of matching is, for every treated unit, to find one (or more) non-treated unit(s) with similar observable characteristics against whom the effect of the treatment can be assessed. By matching treated units to similar non-treated units, matching enables a comparison of outcomes among treated and non-treated units to estimate the effect of the treatment reducing bias due to confounding. Propensity score matching, an early matching technique, was developed as part of the Rubin causal model.Matching has been promoted by Donald Rubin. It was prominently criticized in economics by LaLonde (1986), who compared estimates of treatment effects from an experiment to comparable estimates produced with matching methods and showed that matching methods are biased. Dehejia and Wahba (1999) reevaluted LaLonde's critique and show that matching is a good solution. Similar critiques have been raised in political science and sociology journals. |